Monday, January 30, 2012

Robin van Persie scores two penalties to take Arsenal past Aston Villa

So now we know. If you wish to substitute Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, you do it with two minutes to go, with your team in the lead, and you bring on Thierry Henry. Signal joyous whoops all round. As it happened, the idea of any kind of happy ending was difficult to imagine at half‑time, as Arsenal trailed 2-0 and appeared to be on their way to yet another crushing blow after three straight Premier League defeats.

All reason pointed towards gloom. Few inside the stadium would have backed Arsenal to rebound from another punishing spell on the ropes. As Arsène Wenger admitted: "When you don't win, belief goes."

But against all expectation, the players rallied during the interval in the bowels of the Emirates Stadium, found reserves of courage to disprove the doubters, and scored three goals in a frenetic seven‑minute burst to tip this compelling Cup tie on its head.

Theo Walcott, one of those who comes most under scrutiny at times like this, was quick to suggest that there can be more to this team than meets the eye. "It just shows we have got characters in the dressing room even though no one thinks we do," he said pointedly.

The Arsenal manager had suggested that his team required a performance to get their crowd back onside but, with nerves frayed by recent events, just what they needed was to go a goal behind. And just to make them feel even better about themselves it was assisted by typically passive defending.

Villa had already come close to a gift in the 21st minute as Lukasz Fabianski pelted off his line to meet a 50‑50 ball against Darren Bent. The Arsenal goalkeeper missed, and the Villa striker was centimetres away from a clean connection in front of an unguarded net.

It was not long before the visitors profited from Arsenal's aerial hesitancy. Just after the half‑hour they eased in front when Robbie Keane found space to angle in a cross which invited Richard Dunne to leap highest, and with most conviction, to thump in a header. The two old Irish team-mates, who knew each other's game inside out, were thrilled.

In an instant the home tension‑ometer ratcheted up a few notches. Then on the stroke of half‑time the mood worsened. Arsenal again found little resistance as Villa launched an electric counterattack. When Stephen Ireland helped the move on to Bent, the England forward lashed in an angled shot.

Although Fabianski parried, Bent steered the rebound in from an even tighter spot. Villa's noisy contingent, who benefited from the chairman, Randy Lerner, laying on 70 coaches for this expedition, erupted. "The first half was blinding, brilliant, international class," said Alex McLeish. "But it's never over, is it. I said to the boys at half‑time there's 45 minutes to go."

Arsenal were reeling. They had enjoyed a decent amount of possession, even testing Shay Given a couple of times. Thomas Vermaelen whacked in a shot from 30 yards and Oxlade-Chamberlain took aim from long range. Effort was not really the problem for Arsenal. Quality was. They emerged after half‑time accompanied by an anthem by the aptly named House of Pain.

Could they muster the fortitude, and the finesse, to recover? Recent form would suggest absolutely not. Yet in an dazzling turnaround Arsenal transformed 0-2 into 3-2.

Per Mertesacker and Aaron Ramsey both glimpsed chances before Robin van Persie was able take control by getting into shooting territory.

Arsenal were awarded a penalty when Alex Song carved Villa open with a threaded pass to Ramsey, who was felled by Dunne. The defender, who had already been cautioned, was fortunate not to receive double punishment as a clear scoring opportunity was denied. Van Persie stepped up to slot his kick low and true past Given.

Arsenal were level when Walcott cruised past Stephen Warnock and saw his dinked shot repelled by Given on the line. Alan Hutton attempted to clear, but only shunted the ball against the winger and in.

Astonishingly, moments later Arsenal were in front. Laurent Koscielny galloped upfield and left the chasing Bent in his wake, which takes some doing. Bent was lured into a clumsy challenge and the referee awarded his second penalty. The ever confident Van Persie crashed his second effort high into the net. He ran into the arms of the substitute Henry.

Wenger, who has felt aggrieved about the non-award of some clear penalty appeals for his team in recent games, was pleasantly surprised to see Michael Jones deliver two. "That was one of the positives of the day," he said wryly.

Villa staggered around for a while, unable to take in quite what had happened, and then refocused. Stilian Petrov was a picture of frustration when his move was intercepted by Mertesacker. Ciaran Clark nodded in a header which Fabianski smothered. Van Persie retreated to help and blocked off Keane. McLeish was incandescent about an offside decision that went against his team. "To say I am disappointed we did not see it out is an understatement."

Arsenal reclaimed control and a gutsy mission was accomplished.

Source: Amy Lawrence, The Guardian on 29 Jan 12

Gunners get out of jail

Arsene Wenger may have delivered nearly 900 half-time team talks as Arsenal manager, yet few have been more significant than the oration he offered during the interval in this FA Cup fourth round tie.

With the jeers of his own supporters ringing in his ears after a lamentable first half performance from his lacklustre team saw them reach the halfway point 2-0 behind, Wenger knew his well-worn script of excuses would not drown out the growing frustration of supporters whose previously unshakable devotion to their manager is being tested like never before.

If a month that has included defeats against Fulham, Swansea and Manchester United had concluded with a harrowing FA Cup exit against Aston Villa in front of a disgruntled Emirates Stadium audience, the final, substantial clutch of devotees to the Wenger cause may have struggled to contain the bubble of anger that has been simmering under the surface.

As he assembled his shell-shocked troops for this interval dressing down, the need for him to deliver the right message had never been more acute. Blunt in attack and lacklustre in defence, the first scenes of this drama offered up an all-too familiar tale for an Arsenal side playing before a larger than average array of unoccupied red seats.

Those unwanted pews, despite an official attendance of 60,019, provided some confirmation that a growing number of Arsenal fans are losing faith in a team who have guaranteed little more than false promise in recent years, with the looming disaster offered by this FA Cup tie threatening to plunge Arsenal's season into a full blown crisis.

Goals from Richard Dunne and Darren Bent were all too predictable as, in truth, Arsenal looked vulnerable every time Villa broke into their attacking third in the opening 45 minutes. The persistently uncomfortable presence of reserve keeper Lukas Fabianski and the consistently unconvincing Per Mertesacker were fuelling the suspicion that Wenger had fluffed his lines with his latest starting line-up, with Arsenal's supporters hardly in forgiving mood on a day when victory was demanded.

It is at moments such as this that the game's great managers tend to rise to the occasion and such was the plotline here, with a stony-faced Wenger delivering what he later described as a 'calm' team-talk that inspired an instant response in the opening 15 minutes of what could be a season-defining second half.

Two Robin van Persie penalties sandwiched a fortunate Theo Walcott goal to transform this captivating tie in thrilling fashion, giving the always immaculately presented Wenger an opportunity to insist those who may have been preparing obituaries for his team should steer clear of such pessimism.

"Our desire to stay in the FA Cup was enough to get us back into the game, but I always believed in this team's spirit and ability to perform as they did after the break," stated a curiously sombre Wenger. "I felt the 2-0 half-time score line was very harsh on us and so long as we scored the next goal, we would always have a chance.

"Villa were catching us on counter attacks and that is something we needed to address, but the key for me was that we needed to stay focused and calm. The second half performance confirmed that we can produce under pressure and this is what we need to build on. We are through to the next round of the cup and it doesn't matter so much now how we got there.

"I look at the performance in the second half against Manchester United last week and the display in the second half here was another example of what we can do when we play with a good tempo and with a clear mind."

Villa's red-faced and fiery Scottish boss Alex McLeish was never likely to be as laid back as he assessed the wreckage of his FA Cup dream, with what he described as a 'terrible eight minute spell' costing his side what could have been a famous victory at Emirates Stadium.

"We have to take this result on the chin, even though that seems hard to do at this moment," stated McLeish. "The first Arsenal goal gave them the lift they needed and we spoke about trying to avoid that at half-time. Their second goal came far too quickly for us as well and amid it all, we had the chances to snatch a draw.

"I felt the second of their penalties was a little harsh, but we gave them a chance to come back into the game and they have the pace to hurt you on the flanks. Still we have to get over this and look to our next league game, which is vitally important to us."

On a day when so many of Arsenal's enduring failings were given another public airing, it seems a little over optimistic to suggest this victory is a turning point that offers the potential to direct their troubled season on a more glorious course.

However, that has to be the mantra Arsene Wenger promotes after this ominous brush with disaster.

MAN OF THE MATCH: Robin van Persie
Two coolly taken penalties were required by the captain to ease Arsenal into the fifth round of the FA Cup. When they needed their leader to deliver, he held his nerve superbly.

WENGER PROGRAMME NOTES
The Arsenal manager conceded his side need to improve their focus over the course of an entire 90 minutes if they are to achieve their targets for this season, yet the first half of this game was another example of their inability to do just that.

DUNNE ESCAPE
Referee Mike Jones was bizarrely generous as he refused to hand Villa's Richard Dunne a second yellow card for hacking down Aaron Ramsey in the box to hand Arsenal their first penalty. The challenge could even have resulted in a straight red card, and the already cautioned Irishman was hugely fortunate to stay on the field.

SAGNA RETURN
Wenger was delighted to see Bacary Sagna make his long-awaited return from injury in this game, but he could offer no suggestion of a possible comeback date for midfielder Jack Wilshere after his latest injury setback.

VILLA VERDICT
Tactically superb and oozing with energy in the first half, the visitors executed their game plan with clinical precision in the first half. Stephen Ireland, in particular, shone in their early burst, yet their second half capitulation was a major disappointment for boss Alex McLeish.

ARSENAL VERDICT
Having dodged this potentially devastating FA Cup bullet, Wenger now has the Champions League tie against AC Milan, an FA Cup fifth round date against Middlesbrough or Sunderland and league games against Spurs and Liverpool on the horizon. January has hardly been a triumph for Arsenal, but February seems certain to make or break their season.

Source: Kevin Palmer, ESPN Soccernet on 29 Jan 12

Wenger's reaction to the Arsenal 3-2 Aston Villa match

on the match overall...
It was a good test to show that we had the mental qualities to come back. On the other hand it was important that we didn't panic [at half time]. To concede a goal just on half time for 2-0 was a difficult blow, but we responded very well against Manchester United here [last week] and we did it again today. Overall it was a classic FA Cup tie, 2-0 down and we came back. We had to fight to score three goals and we did it well. I felt it was harsh to be 2-0 down at half time, but Aston Villa are a good counter-attacking team and unfortunately we couldn't score in the first half. In the second half it was all us.

on Arsenal's spirit in the second half…
I was very impressed because I felt that when you come out of a bad period like we are, and you are 2-0 down, you can feel sorry for yourself or you can show you have the mental qualities to play for this club. I was very proud that the team came out and showed they are not ready to lie down.

On what was said at half time…
We always keep what is said in the dressing room [to ourselves]. The players were all very positive at half time and we showed that in the second half. It was important to put massive pressure on them in their half and not let them come out [with the ball]. We closed them down very hard in their own half.

on what the comeback might mean…
I hope [it means] that we can bounce back in the Premier League as well. I hope it convinces the team we have the required qualities and we can transfer that to the Premier League.

on Jack Wilshere's fitness…
I spoke to Jack today. We have no real news yet. The first news we have had is better than expected. He is not in a boot, but I don't know more. His morale looks quite good and I hope it will only be a short setback.There will be more tests this week.

on the players having something to prove…
Last year was a learning process. We went for four trophies and in February we were still in all four. When we had to play the Carling Cup final we were a bit nervous because we hadn't delivered, but they have learnt from that. Hopefully we can show it this year.

on Abou Diaby's comeback…
He is coming back on Tuesday. He has been in a rehab centre and has worked very hard. We feel that when he comes back he will need three more weeks of training, so the earliest he will play will be the end of February.

on Ryo's future…
I will have a chat with him tomorrow and I have a little plan. Oxlade-Chamberlain plays on the flanks now too, so if I can find an opportunity for him to play somewhere I will decide whether to do that tomorrow. It will have to be in England because he will lose the homegrown [status] if he leaves the country.

on winning two penalties…
I must say that was one of the positives today!

on Lukasz Fabianski…
He lacks a bit of match practice. Overall he did well. On the second goal he parried [Bent's shot] well, and it was unlucky because the ball came back to Bent, who is a great finisher.

on whether the players' belief has waned…
When you don't win, the belief goes and we lost three games in the Premier League. The belief is not stable no matter what your history is. It depends on the recent history of the team.

on whether he will sign anyone…
Certainly not. But you never know!

Source: Arsenal.com on 29 Jan 12

29 January 2012: Arsenal 3-2 Aston Villa, The Emirates

Arsenal struck three goals in seven superb second-half minutes to storm into the FA Cup fifth round on Sunday.

After 45 minutes this afternoon at Emirates Stadium, Arsène Wenger’s side were staring at an early exit.

Richard Dunne and Darren Bent had given the visitors a 2-0 lead. It seemed that they would be travelling to Sunderland or Middlesbrough in the last 16.

However, sometimes you only realise your own strength when it is truly tested.

Robin van Persie started the comeback from the penalty spot in the 54th minute after Dunne had clattered Aaron Ramsey. Shortly afterwards, Alan Hutton’s clearance cannoned off Theo Walcott and flew into the net.

Then, in the 61st minute, Bent fouled Laurent Koscielny and Van Persie put Arsenal in front for the first time.

By way of celebration the Dutchman jumped into the arms of substitute Thierry Henry, who was warming up on the sidelines.

The expected Villa reply did not really materialise. But then Arsenal had not deserved to be trailing at the break. Sheer guts had hauled them back into a game in which everything had gone against them.

That will surely have a galvanising effect on the squad for the challenges ahead this season.

Underestimate Arsenal at your peril.

Wenger had spent the weekend waiting on fitness tests and mulling over his side. The manager was aware that he would face Bolton and Blackburn in two key Premier League fixtures over the next six days.

In the end, all the injury news was positive and the manager went for a strong line-up. Francis Coquelin returned at right back for the first time since January 2. Lukasz Fabianski had last played at Olympiacos a month earlier. This afternoon he came in as Wojciech Szczesny was rested.

Van Persie had missed the 1-0 win over Leeds in the last round but he started today. Henry and Mikel Arteta were both declared fit but began on the bench.

And, for the first time since October 2, Bacary Sagna was named in a first-team squad. The right back had recovered ahead of schedule from the broken ankle he had suffered at White Hart Lane.

Most of the crowd at Emirates Stadium had already taken their seats when the fifth-round draw was made.

However, focus could not be taken from the matter in hand. Villa had lost only once since they had been narrowly beaten by Arsenal in Birmingham four days before Christmas. And during that spell they had won at Chelsea.

But then, if anything, Villa are an ‘away’ side - they have only lost twice on the road in the Premier League this season.

They would demonstrate that form during this game but it was the home side who took control early on.

After five minutes, Van Persie rolled a free-kick to Thomas Vermaelen who thundered 30-yard effort towards goal at a venomous pace. Shay Given did well to fist the ball over the bar.

Then Tomas Rosicky freed Walcott on the right. He struggled for balance after being clipped and fired his shot wide.

In the 19th minute, Van Persie just failed to connect with Walcott’s low cross and, midway through the half, the captain fired a free-kick into the wall.

To this point, Villa had not registered an effort on goal. But they had threatened. The pace of Gabriel Agbonlahor stretched Arsenal on their right flank while the visitors had a willing worker in Robbie Keane.

And the Irishman played a pivotal role when Villa took the lead just past the half hour. Keane worked a short corner with Stiliyan Petrov before clipping a cross to the far post. Dunne rose highest to plunder a header from close range.

Arsenal’s response was immediate. Oxlade-Chamberlain, who was catching the eye once again, reached the byline but his cutback was cleared. Then Rosicky’s snap shot was momentarily spilt by Given.

As half time approached, the home side had built a head of steam. Coquelin’s angled drive through a crowded area was hurriedly hacked clear by Stephen Warnock. Then Aaron Ramsey tricked his way to the byline but Given managed to block as the Welshman tried to squeeze in a shot at the near post.

On the whistle, Van Persie rolled a free-kick to Oxlade-Chamberlain who, like Vermaelen, cracked a rocket-fuelled effort at Given. Again the keeper could not hang on.

Arsenal were piling on the pressure in search of an equaliser. However, they would concede again in injury time.

Villa broke clear and Stephen Ireland fed Bent on the right of the area. Fabianski saved superbly from his first effort but the Englishman pounced on the rebound and squeezed home his shot from the narrowest of angles.

The half-time statistics suggested Arsenal were unfortunate to be trailing at all. However, they had to score twice, at least, in order to stay in the FA Cup.

They might have grabbed one in the opening three minutes. Van Persie’s right-wing was met by the head of Mertesacker. Ireland booted the ball off the line at the far post.

Walcott nearly dribbled his way through and another intricate move saw Ramsey prod a shot at Given.

You sensed Arsenal needed to get some reward in this period if they were to come back.

Fortunately, it arrived just at that moment.

In the 54th minute, Alex Song’s perceptive through ball sent Ramsey clear. He was clean through but Dunne cleaned him out. Van Persie scored from the spot. No 24 of the season.

Three minutes later, Arsenal were level. Walcott darted in from the right, reached the byline and poked a cross into the heart of the area. Hutton swung at his clearance which hit the Arsenal striker and bounced into the unguarded net.

You can call that lucky if you like but Liverpool had scored a similar goal into the same net at the Emirates in the opening home game of the Premier League season.

A small illustration that footballing fortune can even itself out.

Often you find teams that draw level in such rapid fashion and draw breath soon afterwards. However, Arsenal did not take their foot off the pedal this afternoon and, in the 61st minute, grabbed the lead.

Koscielny went marauding down the left and was clumsily brought down by Bent just inside the area.

Van Persie scored No 25 from the spot.

Emirates Stadium had been a cauldron while those three goals were going in. Now it became just a little becalmed. Walcott nearly gave Arsenal a cushion, but Given beat away his drive.

Villa had been caught in a maelstrom. However, time was ticking away and they had to gamble.

Petrov popped up on the byline but Mertesacker blocked his cross with Bent lurking behind him.

Then Ireland’s cross was steered into Fabianski’s arms by the head of Ciaran Clark from point-blank range.

But it was Arsenal pressing forward in the dying minutes. Henry had a glimpse of a chance and Sagna even grabbed a few minutes at the end.

The striker had performed a fairytale comeback in the last round. This time the team had done the job.

Either way, Arsenal are conjuring up special moments in the FA Cup this season.

Source: Richard Clarke, Arsenal.com on 29 Jan 12

How Arsenal fell out of love with the enigma that is Andrey Arshavin

Three years after arriving at the Emirates, the little Russian's days look numbered in north London

Andrey Arshavin was a nine-year-old prospect making his way through the Smena football academy in St Petersburg when one of his compatriots blazed the trail into English football. Andrei Kanchelskis joined Manchester United and soon became one of 13 players from outside Britain and Ireland to take part in the first weekend of the newly formed Premier League.

Even as the imports boomed, Russians remained a rarity. In 1996, to universal astonishment, Sergei Yuran and Vasili Kulkov, internationals with pedigree honed at Benfica, Porto and Spartak Moscow, suddenly turned up at Millwall, who were struggling in England's second tier. "Obviously we have played for some of the great clubs in Europe but this is the pinnacle of our careers," announced Yuran at his official unveiling, before he and his friend flopped spectacularly. Millwall's manager, Jimmy Nicholl, gave a succinct assessment of Yuran's efforts: "The only thing the other players could have possibly learned from him while he was here was how to steal a living."

With the benefit of a little hindsight, Yuran, whose spell in England is recalled as a drunken blur as he arrived intent to continue his recent wedding celebrations for as long as possible, could not even disagree.

"Jimmy Nicholl even said that I was the most unprofessional player he'd ever met," he says. "And that was true. I gave in to my weaknesses. My honeymoon lasted for six months. I forgot about football. I'd turn up for training after yet another wild night at a disco with my beloved new wife." Yuran and Kulkov lasted six months in England.

For some reason Russian players who arrive with qualities seemingly perfect for Premier League football tend to lose their powers in England. Roman Pavlyuchenko has never quite lived up to expectation at Tottenham. Yuri Zhirkov came and went at Chelsea. Diniyar Bilyaletdinov has just returned to the Russian league after an unconvincing spell at Everton. But none are quite as puzzling as Arshavin.

When Arsenal signed him in snowbound London at the end of the January transfer window three years ago, the sense of anticipation was palpable. Here was a player with originality and technique who possessed the kind of talent you could build a team around. Zenit St Petersburg had done that and been brilliantly rewarded with trophies. Russia had done that and captured the imagination at the 2008 European Championship. Arsenal fans had not been so excited by a transfer since Dennis Bergkamp arrived from Italy. "I am Gooner," said Arshavin with that meerkat voice and funny owlish expression. They were smitten.

Fast forward to last Sunday and Arshavin was the collateral damage when Arsène Wenger was vilified by Arsenal fans for substituting Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain. Arshavin looked visibly shocked as the boos cascaded down.

Wenger was right to point out later that the opprobrium was not so much directed at Arshavin coming on, but at the hooking of a player who had lit up the game. But when Arshavin went home to reflect upon what had happened, he should have been asking himself this: I have been here for three seasons and am at the age I should be at my peak. I am captain of Russia. I am the club's record signing. Shouldn't I be the one they don't want to see leaving the pitch having played like a dream?

Arshavin has, for some time, looked like a shadow of the player who threatened to dazzle in England, but now the memory of a luminescent night at Anfield when he scored four goals is a reminder of what might have been.

His body language – and some might argue his body shape – has changed considerably. Wenger reiterated how much he "loves" Arshavin as a player and also as a person in the build-up to an FA Cup meeting with Aston Villa, but it must be frustrating to feel that he has evidently not been able to flick the switch to spark the mercurial Russian into a consistent run of form.

Wenger's reluctance to play him in his preferred position, as a classic No10, is confusing. While it is easy to criticise Arshavin, and he has too easily appeared defeatist, the requirements of a modern winger – the ability to track back, the stamina to patrol his flank, the pace to beat a full-back – have never been his major assets. Imagine if Bergkamp, who was a terrible tackler, and relied on speed of thought rather than speed of movement – had been asked to play wide left for three seasons. It probably would not have inspired the best from him, either.

Wenger's history of moulding efficient wide attacking midfield players who scored and assisted, which he did to brilliant effect with Freddie Ljungberg and Robert Pires, is something he has strained to recreate in recent years with Tomas Rosicky, Theo Walcott and Arshavin.

Ironically, Arshavin's best performance this season came as a playmaker, roaming from a central position behind the strikers, in a Carling Cup win against Bolton Wanderers.

As an unhappy, under-confident, player, a return to Russia is probably best for all concerned. But with Arsenal's squad so stretched, with attacking options so limited, and with the club unlikely to ring the changes in what's left of this winter window, that is not realistic for now. The mystery of Arshavin's struggle in England is destined to go on.

Source: Amy Lawrence, The Guardian on 28 Jan 12

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Arsenal: Six Deep Flaws Exposed By Manchester United

All the tall after the match might have been about RVPs reaction to the Ox being substituted for Arshavin, but the problems exposed yesterday go much deeper than a spat...

Psychological problems need to be addressed immediately…
Any team coming off the back of a dreadful showing like Arsenal’s at Swansea last week should want to come out fighting to prove a few people wrong, but that’s exactly what Arsenal didn’t do in the first half against Manchester United yesterday. Instead of pressing them back, putting them under pressure and moving the ball quickly, they sat deep, invited Nani and Valencia to run at them and dallied in possession. There was no change from last week at all.

It’s concerning that this hasn’t been addressed. You must wonder what advice is being given before the players enter the field when a first half performance of such sluggishness is produced. The drive has completely disappeared from midfield, the creative players are woefully short on confidence, and no one wants to take charge of the situation. Expect the old adage of Arsenal lacking leadership to rear itself again soon.

…and so do the technical ones
Aaron Ramsey has been overused this season, and it’s starting to show. His eye for a through ball, like the superb pass he slid through for Gervinho which led to Robin van Persie’s first at Stamford Bridge in October, has deserted him, and with no Mikel Arteta either, there’s a no one to pick a pass from the centre of the pitch. Tomas Rosicky was selected as the best of a bad bunch of replacements for the Spaniard, but despite working reasonably hard, he failed to make an impact and looks to be counting down the days until he can leave.

With Theo Walcott and Andrei Arshavin effectively making Arsenal’s attacks a man light with their wastefulness, there is a desperate lack of a regular and reliable creator of chances. That Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain looked most likely to come up with the unexpected is a positive for his development, but worrying for the rest of the team.

The development of young talent goes stagnant too quickly
Hope that Aaron Ramsey and Theo Walcott will become the world-class players Gooners want them to slip away with every disappointing performance. There is ground for concern that they could go the same way as (deep breath) Jeremie Aliadiere, Quincy Owusu Abeyie, Nicklas Bendtner, Arturo Lupoli, Jay Emmanuel-Thomas, Denilson, David Bentley, Justin Hoyte, Armand Traore, Fran Merida, Carlos Vela and any other player that’s excited in the Carling Cup and reserves but never become a top level first team regular.

“So and so is going to be great in a few years,” and “have you seen the YouTube videos of this player,” are sentiments that have been echoed regularly in Arsenal circles since the Carling Cup has been used to blood youngsters, but for all the developed players, the substance has lacked. There have been shining lights: Cesc Fabregas is legitimately a player developed at Arsenal and Gael Clichy, Jack Wilshere and Wojciech Szcsesny have all served/are serving the club well. Here’s to hoping Walcott and Ramsey find their feet, and that Oxlade-Chamberlain, Coquelin and Frimpong don’t go the same way as many before them.

There is a lack of tactical flexibility
Arsenal are stuck in a tactical rut created by Wenger’s stubbornness. On Sunday, United looked initially to be lining up 4-4-1-1, with Welbeck up front and Rooney just behind. Carrick and Giggs anchored the midfield and Nani and Valencia were a constant threat on the flanks. But Rooney was able to drop deep, at times making a 4-3-2-1 (with Nani and Valencia as the two), to frustrate Arsenal and set United up for counter attacks. Earlier in the day Spurs demonstrated how to play quickly and directly, with first two out-and-out wingers, then two inverted wingers, while Rafael van der Vaart and Luka Modric alternated as the main support for Jermain Defoe. Meanwhile, City had enough fluidity in their immensely talented front four to cause problems at the other end.

The most insightful switch Wenger could devise was to occasionally switch Walcott and Oxlade-Chamberlain, then chuck Park Chu-Young on with ten minutes left. Since Wenger switched from 4-4-2 to 4-2-3-1, forced partly by the departure of Dennis Bergkamp, there’s been no looking back. Whether he doesn’t want to be proved wrong or whether he genuinely believes the current shape is the best way forward is unknown. Either way, it’s not helping when the game needs to be changed, or the opposition has sussed out a method of containment. And that’s happening far too often at the moment.

The Emirates is as divided as it’s ever been
When Oxlade-Chamberlain was replaced by Andrei Arshavin in the 74th minute, a ripple of “you don’t know what you’re doing” was aimed at Arsene Wenger. It wasn’t deafening and wasn’t the majority, but it was telling. Public opinion of Wenger is at its lowest point since the 8-2 defeat to United back in August, but at the time, leeway was given because the transfer window had yet to be closed and Arsenal were decimated by injuries. Now, the repetitive excuses and the refusal to blame his players is wearing so thin, that even staunch pro-Wengerites are weary. I should know, I’m one of them.

And if that’s the fans, what about the players? Robin van Persie’s perplexed reaction after the Oxlade-Chamberlain change summed up how they must be feeling towards their manager. Defiantly, Wenger defended the decision, saying a man of his experience didn’t have to justify everything he did. Van Persie, and the fans, might have a different view.

A draw at home to Man United would have felt like a victory
Should it be sad or expected that it’s come to this? With ten minutes to go I was praying that Arsenal could hold on for a draw, but Welbeck struck and it wasn’t to be. I felt as a fan of any team would in the same situation. A draw would have felt like we’d p*ssed off United, as well as gained a point, but considering they’re challenging for the title and we’re struggling for fourth, makes me feel a bit pathetic.

But Man United should beat Arsenal every time shouldn’t they? They have the wealth, the fan base, are apparently the biggest club in the world, and can price Arsenal out of a transfer whenever they like. The thing is, Arsenal fans didn’t used to need to make these excuses.

Source: Joe Tyler, The Sabotage Times on 23 Jan 12

More gutting than the 8-2

For the third Premier League game in a row, we've lost a match where we could, and should, have got some points. When looking at the match out of context and just comparing it to our last meeting with Manchester United, losing 2-1 is a lot better than losing 8-2. However humiliating and utterly depressing that result was, the defeat at the Emirates was almost more infuriating because of our desperate need for points, and how we failed to claim those points when they were there for the taking.

One of reasons for not taking those points that has been heavily focussed on by some fans in the immediate aftermath of the game, was the substitution of Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain and the introduction of Andrey Arshavin. Before talking more about that, it's worth giving the Ox his due praise.

We need to be realistic about Oxlade-Chamberlain as he's still only 18 and won't produce performances like that every game, but he was superb against Manchester United. He played without fear, he ran with the ball, he ran hard for the team and picked up a great assist. There were moments when his inexperienced showed, but his enthusiasm, direct dribbling and skill on the ball more than made up for up. I was sceptical about Wenger spending a substantial chunk of money on the Ox in the summer as I wasn't sure if he was needed. I can now see why he was signed and it just makes you wonder why he wasn't unleashed earlier.

So with the Ox flying, the full backs not looking comfortable against him and the momentum with us after equalising, why take him off? I can understand that Oxlade-Chamberlain could have been tiring given how much he put into the game, although there didn’t seem to be signs of him seriously suffering. Surely we could have given him at least another five minutes to run on adrenalin and the atmosphere created from the goal.

I realise that we have to protect our young players to a certain extent to avoid them getting injured, but he was a brilliant outlet for us with the game becoming stretched. I have always been, and will probably always be, a defender of Arsene Wenger, but he should have been able to see that the Ox was our most dangerous player. If he wanted to bring Arshavin on, why not take off the knackered Ramsey or the less dangerous Walcott? If Oxlade-Chamberlain then did seriously tire, Benayoun and Park were still options off the bench.

I think the fact Arshavin came on only added to the anger from some fans at the substitution. The Ox was full of energy, pace and direct running, something we haven’t seen from Arshavin for ages, if ever. To replace him with someone who is nicknamed ‘The Lazy Russian’ was only going to provoke a reaction. I think the booing of Arshavin when he came on was harsh, he didn’t choose who he came on for, but it was an outpouring of the frustrations at the current state of the club. Arshavin shouldn’t be made a scapegoat for losing the game, but his introduction to the action didn’t help.

I personally thought the booing was over the top as we were in a situation in the match where we should have been pushing on for a win and we needed positivity from the stands, but I think the switch just sparked a moment for Arsenal fans’ recent frustrations to reach the surface, and it wasn’t pretty. I’m not going to call for Wenger to be sacked over one substitution, I’d just like him to show some more flexibility and adapt to a situation. The Ox was playing well, Arshavin’s form has been poor; you can do the maths.

Arshavin wasn’t the reason we lost the game. I think the biggest reason for it was not really turning up in the first half. As a team, we didn’t keep the ball well enough and didn’t close United down. As the half went on, we invited pressure. Whether the players had the 8-2, or recent form, in their heads I don’t know, but they looked slightly scared. Djourou was horribly exposed at right back as he didn’t close down Nani, or anyone who went to his area of the pitch wearing blue. Had he closed down Giggs, the first goal would have been easily avoided. I’ve said on this blog before that Djourou is not a full back and still hasn’t adapted despite playing there regularly in recent weeks. He is a shadow of the man who was arguably our best centre back at this time last season.

We deserved to be losing at half time, but the team, and Wenger, do deserve credit for the reaction in the second half. I think Djourou went off with an injury problem as he was limping slightly near the end of the first half, but I was very impressed by Nico Yennaris. There was a lot of pressure on him and he coped well. We shouldn’t be in a position where we’re throwing youngsters like Yennaris into big games like this, but the young guys that have been forced to play have given absolutely everything, and we can’t ask for more. It was just good to have someone at right back who had a good understanding of positioning as a full back, both defensively and going forward.

Along with the Ox and Yennaris, the other stand-out performers were Koscielny and Rosicky. Koscielny hasn’t just improved technically, his stamina, commitment and determination is what all players in the squad should aspire to. His tackle to start the move for our goal was perfect. Whilst Wenger rightly has critics for some recent events, despite it taking a year, the signing of Koscielny is also looking like a good decision. Tomas Rosicky battled very hard in midfield. His pass to Oxlade-Chamberlain in the build-up to the goal shouldn’t be underestimated. If Arteta comes back next week, hopefully Rosicky will retain his place to give Ramsey a much needed rest.

A word too for Per Mertesacker. Whilst some seem to absolutely hate him, I still like him. We know he hasn’t got pace, but he made some important interceptions and clearances in the game. Also, he was hideously out-paced in the second half by Welbeck, but showed great commitment to chase back and hook the ball off the line. He’s another player that is giving everything for the team.

Had we played like we did in the second half for the whole match, I’m confident that we’d have got at least a point from the game. Even though we only really played for 45 minutes, Robin van Persie missed a great chance before he eventually scored, which was a superb finish, so we could have salvaged a point.

Ultimately Manchester United were more efficient and more clinical. Also, maybe we aren’t clever enough and, this could be a back handed compliment to United, they were very good at getting fouls for nothing, and getting away with incidents that could have been fouls. They were only minor things, but added to the dissatisfaction in the ground. Jonny Evans was regularly shoving and holding Robin van Persie, yet a slight push on Rooney at the other end was deemed a foul. United’s time wasting near the end was also top notch. It could just be a coincidence that we’ve not won our last 11 games that Mike Dean has refereed, but he did seem card happy in a match that wasn’t a dirty game. We didn’t have a big decision go against us, the little ones weren’t that significant in the match, and maybe we just have to know how to make a foul look like one, but it was just frustrating.

We’re in a position where we’ve almost undone all of the good work we did in the aftermath of the start of the season. Injuries have played a part in that, but so has Wenger’s reluctance to invest in January. Whatever his views of the January transfer window are, it’s there, so make use of it. If that means paying slightly inflated prices but giving us a better chance of making the Champions League, it could be worth the gamble. Unless we beat Bolton in the next league game, the current slide could continue, and the blame will ultimately have to fall to the manager. It’d be speculation to say if he was restricted by the board or not, but he’s in charge of the team, so if there’s a problem, it ultimately is down to him to solve it. We had a massive problem at the start of the season, he solved it and we climbed up the table and he deserved credit for it. Now he has to do the same, or else the ‘disaster’ of not making the Champions League will become a reality. Then Wenger will have much bigger questions to answer than why he subbed Oxlade-Chamberlain and why we didn’t perform in the first half.

Source: Sam Limbert, ESPN Soccernet on 23 Jan 12

José Mourinho joins Arsène Wenger in facing the stirrings of rebellion

Real Madrid manager has found himself in the same position as Arsenal's Arsène Wenger – under attack from players and fans

Arsène Wenger was not the only much-decorated manager to face a questioning of his judgment from one of his senior players and vitriolic criticism from his own fans at the weekend. None other than José Mourinho, his old rival in cross-London derbies, was enduring a similar ordeal in Madrid.

A leak to Marca, the Spanish sports newspaper, revealed that on Friday, 48 hours after Real Madrid had lost at home to Barcelona in the first leg of their Copa del Rey quarter-final, Mourinho ignited an incendiary exchange when he accused Sergio Ramos of giving away their opponents' first goal by failing to follow his orders to mark Carles Puyol. When the player attempted to explain why he had switched to marking Gerard Piqué rather than Puyol, Mourinho responded: "So you're going to be the coach as well, are you?" "No," Ramos replied, "but looking at the situation in a match, sometimes you have to change the marking. But you, you've never been a player, so you don't know what sometimes needs to be done in that kind of a situation."

Real Madrid are five points ahead of Barcelona at the top of La Liga, giving Mourinho a good chance of winning a title in his fourth different country. That is not enough for some supporters, smarting from a series of defeats by their Catalan rivals and resentful of his defence-minded tactics. While Mourinho's team were beating Athletic Bilbao 4-1 in the Bernabéu on Sunday, the chanting of the coach's name by one section of fans led others to respond with derisive whistles.

"You've never been a player, so you don't know ..." Those words of Ramos's must often come into the minds of top footballers finding themselves at cross-purposes with a coach who arrived in the job without having played the game at the highest level. Both Mourinho and Wenger – like Roy Hodgson, Gérard Houllier, André Villas-Boas and others – will have encountered scepticism in their early days, and it may continue to lurk in the thoughts of a disaffected player even when the office of the manager in question contains a cabinet full of trophies.

Wenger was described only last week by George Graham, one of his most successful predecessors, as the greatest manager in the club's history but he has won nothing since 2005 and was jeered by his own supporters during the team's defeat by Manchester United on Sunday. When he watched the replays of the television broadcast he will have seen Robin van Persie's horrified reaction to the withdrawal of Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, just after the teenager had created the chance from which the captain scored the equalising goal.

Mourinho is in his second year with Real Madrid, Wenger in his 16th season at Arsenal. The 48-year-old Portuguese is not a stayer, and it would be no surprise to see him moving to the next phase of his career by the summer of 2013 – or sooner, if he continues to argue with influential players. The 62-year-old Frenchman is different, having spent his time in north London rebuilding the club from top to bottom while imbuing it with his philosophy. Perhaps his current attempt to create another successful side while conforming to strict financial constraints will pay off eventually, but the crescendo of disapproval must surely be starting to affect his enjoyment of a job that brought him so much satisfaction and admiration, as well as a very good living.

Other evidence may point to more significant sources of disquiet. Van Persie's gesture hinted that the Dutchman may not be entirely happy with the course of events. The only regular contributor of goals in a low-scoring team this season, he has 18 months to run on his contract and would not be short of suitors. The much younger Oxlade-Chamberlain stayed on-message during his post-match interview on Sunday night but there have been suggestions that he is frustrated at not being given more time on the pitch since arriving from Southampton in the summer with a £12m price tag.

Are these real indications of fraying morale, or no more than the sort of thing to be expected from a side going through a tricky spell? Arsenal are still in the last 16 of the Champions League and it would be a brave observer who claimed categorically that Wenger is presiding over an irreversible decline. But all empires come to an end, and each ends in its own way, with immediate consequences that are seldom happy.

One common feature is that of emperors who hang on too long. Matt Busby and Brian Clough outstayed their time at Manchester United and Nottingham Forest, with damaging results, although the depth of the gratitude felt by their supporters meant that criticism was largely muted. But these are different times. The fans in the seats are paying more than £1,000 a year for their entertainment – at Arsenal, anyway – and the opening up of the media, from phone-ins to Twitter, has given them a taste for expressing their opinions without restraint.

Like Busby and Clough, Wenger has acquired enormous personal prestige and power within his club, particularly since the departure of David Dein, the club's former chief executive. When the time comes for him to go, whether it is next summer or in 10 years' time, there may be no one with sufficient authority or experience to give him the message.

Source: Richard Williams, The Guardian on 23 Jan 12

Mutiny erupts but no end in sight to Arsenal's ever-decreasing circles

Fans turn on Arsène Wenger but changes at the top are unlikely to halt Arsenal's drop in expectations

The greatest irony, and there were plenty of them around at Arsenal on Sunday, was that the outcry was triggered by a change. Arsène Wenger's decision to substitute a talented youngster with potential for an experienced and expensive international was also, on at least one level, pretty ironic, although no one saw it that way for a simple reason: Andrey Arshavin, the Russia captain, has become a total liability. Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, by contrast, had impressed on his full Premier League debut against Manchester United.

Wenger promoted contrariness afterwards. The jeering of the substitution, he suggested, vindicated his decision to start Oxlade-Chamberlain ahead of Arshavin. Arsenal are living in topsy-turvy times, where even what may appear sensible invites condemnation. The club's financial results are due out by the end of next month and they will be impressively strong. The directors are waiting for a bad day to bury the good news.

Arsenal's supporters are back in mutiny mode and it was a complication for Wenger that Robin van Persie seemed to be on board with them. The captain also expressed his unhappiness at the substitution, which presaged Danny Welbeck's winning goal for United (Arshavin, following Sod's law, had to be at fault) and it did not need the pundit Gary Neville to pronounce that "if the captain's reacting like that, you've got problems".

Wenger is bogged down in them. He should be able to shrug off Van Persie's heat-of-the-moment exasperation and the striker will not base his decision on whether to extend his Arsenal contract in the summer on one substitution that went painfully wrong. "The manager and I are fine and my relationship with the club is good," Van Persie told the Sun. "There is no problem, there is no conflict, there is no controversy."

But the bigger picture is not encouraging the Dutchman or the fans. The United defeat was Arsenal's third in succession and eighth of the Premier League season. They sit five points off the Champions League pace and if the half-full-glass drinkers note that fourth-placed Chelsea still have to visit the Emirates, the half-empty brigade fear that the fixture on 21 April will press Wenger's team out of contention. And that is if they were to remain in it. The apocalyptic scenario is that no Champions League qualification equals no Van Persie next season. Wenger admitted last Friday that no Champions League football equalled a disaster in sporting terms.

Sunday felt like a tipping point for Wenger because the dissent was so vociferous and widespread. Even the supporters who did not chant "You don't know what you're doing" at him surely asked themselves the question. A body that measures in the thousands has lost its faith in the man who famously "knows", and that goes for his substitutions to his decisions in the transfer market.

Gooner soul-searching is nothing new. There was an outbreak of it in the desperate weeks of the early season and there is the sense now that the improved performances and results from the end of September to the turn of the year merely papered over the cracks and the inherent fragility of the squad.

Expectation levels have already been scaled down, just as Wenger's summer deadline-day splurge on a clutch of steady heads marked a change to his approach. The limit of Arsenal's ambitions for the season has long been to finish fourth but the doubters argue the club are sprinting to stand still, even if a Champions League play-off is infinitely preferable to falling off the precipice in fifth.

The fans want, somehow, to get back to the old level, when the team were regular title contenders. Deep down, they wonder whether the squad is good enough, which undermines Wenger's belief that things will be OK when his many injured and unavailable players return. And in order to drive the upturn, there is the growing feeling that fundamental change is required.

The plain fact is, though, that it will not come about easily as it is not only Wenger but the chief executive, Ivan Gazidis, and the majority shareholder, Stan Kroenke, who are wedded to the club's economic model, which is against high-risk spend-to-accumulate offensives.

Those who feel that Wenger should jump or be pushed from his post ought to be careful what they wish for. Kroenke and Gazidis would seek a replacement with similar philosophies and to work in a similar framework, and not only because of the incoming financial fair play regulations. In Wenger, they may already have the best.

A radical view involves the removal of Kroenke and Gazidis, and a fresh approach entirely, perhaps under the leadership of Alisher Usmanov, who owns a little under 30% of the club's shares and has positioned himself against the concept of the self-sustaining business model. It would be fiendishly difficult to see this happening.

Gazidis has identified a huge discrepancy between the worldwide reach of the Arsenal brand and the revenue that it generates. He believes that bringing the latter up to speed – the club have sophisticated strategies in place to do so – is the surest way forward. It is simply not possible to play the sheikhs and the oligarchs at their own game.

And so Wenger and Arsenal will continue to dip their shoulder against emotional supporters, unsatisfactory short-term fixes and the prospect of an excruciating slide. As another crisis bites, there are no clear solutions. The ever-decreasing circles are dizzying.

Source: David Hytner, The Guardian on 23 Jan 12

Monday, January 23, 2012

Arsenal's Arsène Wenger defends decision to bring on Andrey Arshavin


A defiant Arsène Wenger has stood by his decision to substitute Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain for Andrey Arshavin, dismissing the need to justify a move that provoked a furious reaction from a section of the Arsenal support and even one of disbelief from his captain, Robin van Persie, during his side's 2-1 defeat on Sunday.

Wenger had opted to remove the lively Oxlade-Chamberlain, on his full Premier League debut, immediately after the teenager had set up the Dutchman for the hosts' equaliser against Manchester United, and with momentum building in Arsenal's favour. Van Persie had turned to the bench and, with arms stretched out, was seen to mouth "No", with Arshavin, who was booed on to the turf, subsequently culpable as United claimed a late winner.

The Arsenal manager was abused by some home supporters as a result of the decision, the mood turning more poisonous still once Antonio Valencia had exposed Arshavin to provide Danny Welbeck with the game's decisive goal. There was sarcastic applause offered by the fans near the dugout as the Frenchman threw down a water bottle in disgust. "I can understand that the fans are upset about the substitution, especially when it doesn't work," said Wenger. "But that means, first, I made the right decision at the start of the game.

"Oxlade-Chamberlain had started to fatigue, started to stretch his calf, and was not used to the intensity. He was sick during the week. Arshavin is captain of the Russia national team. I have to justify [substituting] a guy of 18 who's playing his second or third game? Let's be serious. I have to stand up for the substitutions I made. I've been 30 years in this job and have made 50,000 substitutions and I have to justify every time I make a decision? I do not have to explain to you every single decision I make."

While Wenger refused to comment on Van Persie's very public exclamation of disbelief at the change, suggesting he had not witnessed it, the former United defender Gary Neville, working as a pundit for Sky television, said: "If the captain's reacting like that, you've got problems."

Neville was more scathing still of Arshavin's subsequent contribution. "You don't like to criticise players, but he looks the most disinterested player in the league to me. He doesn't like our weather. He doesn't like our women. I think he wants to go back to Russia. Well, go back. The Arsenal fans don't want him out there."

"If you expect me to blame an individual player, it will not happen," said Wenger. "We win and lose together. You want me to blame one player? I will not do that. If I've made a mistake, I'm sorry. I'm like a player. I'm not completely sure. It could have happened as well if [Oxlade‑Chamberlain] had stayed on. That's part of United being dangerous on the flanks. But people pay for their tickets and are free to express their emotions. We cannot dictate what behaviour people should have. That doesn't mean they're right always."

While the Arsenal manager conceded defeat – a third in succession for the first time since 2007 – had left his team in "a very difficult position" in terms of Champions League qualification, Sir Alex Ferguson delighted in a win that ensured the gap to Manchester City at the top remains only three points. This game had felt all the more daunting after the leaders' stoppage-time victory over Tottenham Hotspur earlier in the afternoon, though Manchester's joint triumphs over north London have left the title pursuit as a two-horse race. "It is going to be hard for both us and City to collapse in the run-in now," said Ferguson. "We're both ahead of our other rivals and we just have to keep on City's coat-tails. We said that before the game that winning after City had won their game was the important thing. But we did it in the right way: we played football and were adventurous and had belief in ourselves. I'm delighted with that at this time of the season."

Ferguson anticipates being without Phil Jones for "a few weeks" after the player damaged ankle ligaments in the first half. The England defender will be scanned on Monday most likely along with Nani, who hopped from the field after sustaining his own ankle injury late on.

Source: Dominic Fifield, The Guardian on 22 Jan 12

Arsène Wenger's decision to introduce Andrey Arshavin proves costly


In Arsène We Trust. Not here. Not after the 73rd minute, when Arsène Wenger made a substitution that had even his captain Robin van Persie mouthing his disbelief. Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain had just set up Van Persie's equaliser and a stirring second-half jump back from the brink by Arsenal looked set to yield something tangible.

Yet Wenger's decision to replace Oxlade‑Chamerlain's youthful cut and thrust with Andrey Arshavin, who is the player that Arsenal fans love to hate, brought jeers and derision in virtually all corners. And to give the game's principal sub-plot its savage pay-off, Arshavin just had to showcase some of his weak defensive tracking on Manchester United's winning goal, swept home by Danny Welbeck.

Wenger hurled his water bottle down in disgust but behind him in the stands, there were vociferous shows of dissent. Some Arsenal supporters stood to applaud him sarcastically and, later on, there were cries for him to "spend some fucking money", which has become the default setting at times of soul-searching.

At full-time, as the Sky TV cameramen hurried their lenses towards the Frenchman, there was the sight of Sir Alex Ferguson sending him down the tunnel with a sympathetic pat on the back. The Emirates does not normally teem with such open hostility towards Wenger, the manager whose work for the club is so highly regarded, but this felt like a dreadfully low ebb.

The story for Arsenal might have centred upon Van Persie's 23rd goal from 28 appearances this season and the tribute he unveiled on his vest to his grandfather, who was celebrating his 91st birthday in the crowd.

It could have taken in the flashes of promise that Oxlade-Chamberlain showed or, above all, the extraordinary comeback that those in red produced after a first‑half display marked by nervousness and basic errors.

Instead, after Arsenal's third Premier League defeat in succession, it became all about Wenger. On the eve of the game, he had joked that he did not "stay sane" in the face of the pressures that he faced. Plenty of Arsenal fans left the stadium wondering whether he had cracked up.

He had not. He had just made a mistake, despite his determination not to admit it. And the wider question has to be asked concerning Arsenal's fragility. The home team were firmly in the ascendancy and the withdrawal of a tiring teenager on his full Premier League debut ought not to have checked their momentum.

Nor should the introduction of the Russia captain, however disinterested Arshavin frequently looks and however much scorn he invites. Up in the Sky studio, Gary Neville seized the opportunity to plough into the back of him, as he used to do to Jose Reyes.

The episode felt symptomatic of Arsenal's knife-edge existence and even these 90 minutes contained wild mood swings. Booed off at half-time, the jeers returned with interest upon the final whistle but, for the majority of the second half, the home crowd could be delighted at how their team had played.

Everybody inside the ground, chief among them Wenger, suspected that it would not be Arsenal's day when Van Persie belted a golden chance wide in the 51st minute, after Chris Smalling had slipped. Yet Arsenal carried the fight and they created three decent openings before Van Persie atoned with his threaded shot, which proved marginally stronger than Anders Lindegaard's fingertips.

United looked more assured, more balanced and, as even Wenger admitted, "a bit more mature in every position than we are." A glance at the substitutes' benches told you all you needed to know about the strength in depth at both clubs at present.

While United boasted big reputations, Wenger might have counted three players that he wanted to sell; another that he wished he had not signed in the summer; two unproven teenagers and Yossi Benayoun. Wenger pleaded for understanding over his 11 absentees.

Arsenal's first-half travails were epitomised by Johan Djourou, one of the central defenders who has been asked in recent weeks to stick his finger in the defensive dam. The stand-in right-back has found it overwhelming. Sent off at Fulham in the club's first fixture of 2012, he was dominated by Nani and fortunate that the winger's end product was disappointing. Eventually, United reaped reward from their inroads up the left when Ryan Giggs crossed for Antonio Valencia, who exposed Thomas Vermaelen, another centre-half filling in at full-back. The home crowd cheered the announcement that Djourou would not reappear for the second-half.

Wenger was defiant afterwards, and protective of his players. No individual would be singled out for blame. Not even Arshavin. Things would improve, he insisted, when his injury-list eased. Spending in January was still not the answer.

Yet this was a game that Wenger admitted his team "could not afford to lose" in the fight to finish fourth. United continued to pile on the misery. After the 8-2 at Old Trafford in August, this was a 10th victory for them over Arsenal in 13 meetings.

If Wenger thought his season had hit rock bottom in the traumatic early weeks, he had better think again.

Outgunned
3 League games Arsenal have lost in a row, their worst run since April 2007

11 Games in which Arsenal have failed to score more than one goal in the league this season

7 Number of clean sheets Arsenal have kept in the league this season

0 Players other than Robin van Persie whose goal tally runs into double figures for the Gunners this season

6 Away games Arsenal have lost, the joint most in the top half of the table alongside Sunderland

16 Millions of pounds spent on Per Mertesacker and André Santos to bolster the defence last summer

1 Goals Marouane Chamakh has scored this season. Even Thomas Vermaelen has scored two more

Source: David Hytner, The Guardian on 22 Jan 12

Arsenal v Manchester United: five Premier League title pointers

United refuse to give up their title; doubts remain over defence; utility player a must-buy; Valencia a comfort; all over for Arsenal

United refuse to give up their title
Witnessing stoppage time at the Etihad Stadium must have been crushingly deflating for Manchester United, a sense that fate is with Manchester City's championship bid inescapable. Even Sir Alex Ferguson's pre-match assessment that "what we've got to do is make sure we keep on City's coat-tails" felt resigned. Yet, while there are clear weaknesses in their makeup, psychologically this United team retain strength. This game was a test of their powers of reaction, an examination even sterner once Arsenal had revived after the interval and equalised. Yet Danny Welbeck's winner sent out a message: this is not City's title just yet. The pursuit has been maintained.

Doubts remain over United's backline
The champions would argue this represented one of the more daunting trips of the campaign, though the shortcomings of their rejigged and reshaped backline are all too evident these days. Arsenal may have pressured them only in fits and starts but United still creaked, particularly at the beginning of the second half as panic threatened to set in. With Nemanja Vidic a long-term absentee and Rio Ferdinand missing here, there was a fragility to United's defence. Neither Jonny Evans nor Chris Smalling tracked Robin van Persie as he collected Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain's reverse pass to equalise, and other opportunities had been desperately denied up to then. Winning the Premier League title with such an inexperienced rearguard would constitute a considerable achievement for Ferguson.

United miss utility player of choice
The cameras focused on Fabio Capello as Phil Jones was carried round the touchline on a stretcher, though the watching England manager's concern will have been felt more keenly than Ferguson. The damage sustained to the utility player's left ankle as he stumbled in retreat from Theo Walcott will be determined once the swelling recedes, but his discomfort was clear and ominous. While England wonder about Euro 2012, United will ponder whether right-back is fast becoming a position of real concern. Smalling has featured there but was required centrally here. Rafael da Silva, Jones's replacement, is still raw, had been booked by the break and was subbed himself before the end. If there is a position where an addition must be made this January, it is here.

Valencia's return offers reassurance
The Ecuadorean winger maintained recent high standards, unsettling Thomas Vermaelen – a stopgap left‑back – with slippery skill and a crunching header for United's first-half reward. The 26-year-old offers balance and bite, his rhythm thankfully now restored. Perhaps Valencia needed longer to recover fully from the fractured ankle suffered at Rangers in September 2010. He missed much of pre-season last summer after succumbing to injury at the Copa América which certainly set him back but this was like old times with his tormenting of Andrey Arshavin for his side's second proving as much.

Arsenal have been cast to periphery
For much of the second period the momentum was with Arsenal, the home support driving them on in pursuit of their equaliser, only for the mood to turn poisonous. Oxlade-Chamberlain's substitution for Arshavin had the locals in open revolt, the abuse raining down on Arsène Wenger when the Russian was half-hearted in tracking Valencia for United's winner. The title has long gone but a third successive league defeat leaves fourth place five points away, and the third-placed Tottenham Hotspur still 10 clear. Results have reverted to the misery of autumn. The disaster Wenger had feared – a failure to reach the Champions League – may well now become a reality.

Source: Dominic Fifield, The Guardian on 22 Jan 12

Danny Welbeck wins Manchester United all three points at Arsenal


If Manchester United are to relinquish the Premier League title it is clear their grip may have to be released finger by finger. This was an examination of nerve for Sir Alex Ferguson's team and they passed it with distinction on a day when Arsène Wenger faced mutinous chants and Manchester City were given a stark reminder of their neighbours' staying power.

A lesser team may have been gripped by anxiety after Mario Balotelli's late winner for City against Spurs. Instead, United merely reiterated their determination to keep hold of the trophy as they set about the business of cutting back the gap between themselves and City to three points.

It was Arsenal's third successive defeat and Wenger was subjected to sustained and embittered abuse throughout the final stages. The substitute Andrey Arshavin was booed when he replaced Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain and there was more vitriol at the end. Arsenal had been obliging opponents, desperately short of ideas for long spells, and there was something close to sympathy in the way Ferguson consoled his old adversary on the touchline. United had made it a traumatic experience for them.

The champions played with drive and purpose and will reflect that they probably made the job of winning harder than was necessary. Robin van Persie's 71st-minute goal had threatened to take the game away from them but it is when the heat of the battle is at its most extreme that Ferguson's team usually show their durability and their response was quickly delivered. Paul Scholes restored some calm after being introduced. Shortly afterwards, Antonio Valencia exchanged passes with Park Ji-sung inside the penalty area before teeing up Danny Welbeck. The striker lashed in the winner to ensure United had the last word of a telling weekend for the Manchester clubs.

The win was deserved even if Arsenal had recovered from a wretched first half to produce something close to the incisive passing with which they are associated. The champions were in command for long spells, taking the lead when Valencia headed in Ryan Giggs's cross in first-half stoppage time, and though it was disconcerting to see Wenger being attacked in such a way it must have been galling for the home crowd to witness how far their team have slipped. These are the moments when it feels highly improbable Van Persie will choose to stay beyond the end of the season.

United made the first half a particular ordeal for their hosts, with Johan Djourou so disorientated at right-back that he was spared from any further torment after the break and replaced with the 18-year-old Nico Yennaris. Had Nani and, to a lesser extent, Patrice Evra been more accurate with their crosses during this period, United might have been spared the trauma of coming so close to losing points. Giggs, playing Arsenal for the 48th time of his career, showed how it should be done for Valencia's goal, in keeping with a wonderful performance of craft and intelligence from the oldest player on the pitch.

This was the culmination of a 20-minute spell of almost unremitting pressure from the away side. Almost everything originated on the left, targeting Djourou's uncertainty at a time when Arsenal are missing five full-backs through injury. Nani and Evra tormented a player who, in mitigation, was hopelessly exposed at times because of the lack of tracking back from Oxlade-Chamberlain. Welbeck was a constant menace once he had stopped straying offside. Wayne Rooney was a tireless worker, even if his performance was undermined by the moment when he exaggerated the impact of Alex Song's challenge to try to win a cheap penalty.

United were so on top at half-time it might have been complacency that allowed Arsenal to drag themselves back into the match in the second half. The away side lost their impetus and, in a 15-minute spell, Van Persie missed the kind of chance he would usually score blindfolded. Aaron Ramsey shot over, Oxlade-Chamberlain dragged another effort wide and Evra blocked Tomas Rosicky's goal-bound effort.

There was always the sense that United could get behind the home defence. Welbeck, justifying his place ahead of Javier Hernández, ran clear and turned his shot past Wojciech Szczesny only for Per Mertesacker to clear off the line. Other chances were passed up before Van Persie's equaliser, stemming directly from a United chance when Rafael da Silva ran from inside his own half to have the opportunity to make it 2-0. The Brazilian was still out of position as Oxlade-Chamberlain fed Van Persie and the Dutchman scored with a diagonal finish in off the post.

Rafael, a first-half substitute after Phil Jones had sprained his ankle, was substituted himself and, at that point, his naivety, coupled with the occasional wastefulness of United's attackers, looked as though it could be costly. Instead, Welbeck pounced and, once again, we saw United's determination not to allow City to disappear into the distance.

Source: Daniel Taylor, The Guardian on 22 Jan 12

Wenger's reaction to the Arsenal 1-2 Manchester United match

on the performance…
I am really disappointed because we had a difficult first half, a nervous first half. [It was] technically not at the level we want and we came back well with a fantastic fighting spirit in the second half. I thought we had the chances to win the game quite comfortably in the second half but you feel the Manchester United team is a bit more mature in every position than we are.

It was important not to make a mistake, either tactically or attention-wise, and especially on the flank. We were caught at a moment where we felt we were closer to winning the game. Having battled like we did and to come out without anything is very difficult to take.

on the substitution of Andrey Arshavin for Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain…

I can understand that the fans are upset about the substitution, especially when it doesn’t work, but I made the right decision at the start of the game [in starting Oxlade-Chamberlain]. He had started fatigue, stretched his calf and he was sick in the week.

People pay for their tickets and are free to express their emotions. We have to deal with that, not to dictate behaviour to people.

on Robin van Persie’s reaction…

I didn’t see [Robin van Persie’s reaction]. I don’t want to come out on every reaction. We lost the game now and I don’t think I have to explain what I will do. I have to stand up for the result and the substitutions I made.

on Welbeck’s winning goal…
We lose together and we win together, and now you want me to blame one player? I won’t do that. About the player, I am not completely sure. It could have happened if [Oxlade-Chamberlain] stayed on. Manchester United are very dangerous on the flanks.

on the race for a top-four spot…
It leaves us in a very difficult position because we couldn’t afford to lose. But there are also a lot of positives from this game. The way we responded in the second half is a positive thing. It’s difficult to have a reaction like that and come out with no points at all.

I feel the referee had a fair game overall and we had a nervous first half, we didn’t play enough. In the second half we played our game but unfortunately we were not rewarded. But we need to keep that spirit and play.

on the fans calls to spend some money…
Spending the money is not the target, to buy good players is the target. We need our players back. People are not conscious that we miss 10 players. When you see what we created in the second half without [those injured] players, it is important to get the players back.

Source: Arsenal.com on 22 Jan 12

22 January 2012: Arsenal 1-2 Manchester United, The Emirates

Arsenal lost 2-1 to Manchester United at Emirates Stadium on Sunday.

Danny Welbeck struck the winning goal nine minutes from time to tip this evenly-balanced game in favour of Sir Alex Ferguson’s side.

The visitors deserved the lead given to them on the stroke of half time when Antonio Valencia headed home Ryan Giggs’ cross at the far post. However, Arsenal were rejuvenated after the restart and equalised in the 71st minute when Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain set up Robin van Persie to fire home his 23rd goal of campaign.

Both sides were looking for the winner in the dying stages – Arsenal to close the gap on the top four, Manchester United to keep pace with leaders Manchester City.

Unfortunately the visitors found it. However, Wenger’s men showed enough fighting spirit to suggest their battle for Champions League football is far from over.

The two sets of supporters at Emirates Stadium had ample pre-match entertainment this afternoon. Their local rivals, Manchester City and Tottenham, were battling it out up the North West of England.

Mario Balotelli’s late winner had a major impact on both clubs this afternoon – and not just because of local concerns.

Wenger made three changes from the side beaten at Swansea. Fit-again Thomas Vermaelen replaced Ignasi Miquel at left back, Tomas Rosicky came in for Yossi Benayoun and Oxlade-Chamberlain was favoured over Andrey Arshavin.

It was the youngster who caught the eye in the opening stages of his first Premier League start. He raced down the left in the second minute but his dangerous cutback evaded Van Persie.

It was the shape of things to come in the first 15 minutes. Arsenal had the better of the early exchanges. They snapped at the heels of the visitors and, although the final ball was sometimes misplaced, they continued to ask all the questions.

Manchester United’s cohesion was not helped by the loss of Phil Jones after he fell awkwardly when trying to take on Walcott.

However, as we reached the half-way point of the first period, Manchester United were starting to create their fair-share of pressure.

Nani whipped in a cross from the left which was nodded away from the waiting Giggs by Per Mertesacker at the back post. Eventually the ball did find its way to the Welshman and his low, angled shot was saved by Wojciech Szczesny.

Oxlade-Chamberlain was still Arsenal’s brightest hope and, in the 25th minute, he bamboozled Patrice Evra on the byline before Walcott fired over.

The game was opening up now. Arsenal were pressing more and Manchester United were attempting to catch them on the break. But for excellent backtracking by Laurent Koscielny, the galloping Welbeck might have done that just before the half hour.

A few minutes later, Nani tried to find the same striker but Mertesacker intervened.

As the game wore on, Manchester United were squeezing Arsenal but they were yet to force Szczesny into a significant save. That changed 10 minutes from the whistle when Evra cut the ball back to Nani. His first-time shot was superbly stopped by Szczesny low at his near post.

Walcott and Ramsey then combined on the right but the latter’s cross could not find the head of Van Persie at the near post.

Seconds later, Nani got beyond Djourou and, rather optimistically, tried to find the far corner from an acute angle.

Most of the visiting threat had come down the left so it was no surprise that Manchester United’s goal emanated from there. However, it came just as both sides were starting to wind down into half time.

Vermaelen’s clearance went straight to the visitors and Giggs curled a clever cross to the far post where Valencia ghosted in to guide home a header.

It was blow for the home side who had withstood significant pressure and must have thought they would reach the break on level terms.

However, Manchester United would hand them a golden chance for an equaliser within minutes of the restart. Chris Smalling slipped just inside his own half to give Rosicky a clear run at goal. The Czech midfielder reached the edge of the area before finding Van Persie. He weaved himself into position but fired wide of the post. A massive moment.

Wenger had replaced Johan Djourou with Nico Yennaris at the break. The right back, who had been a team mascot in 2000, came on to make his Premier League debut.

However, in Nani, the 18-year-old was facing one of the most potent attacking threats on the pitch. A couple of minutes later, one of his clever cutbacks was hurriedly cleared by the head of Koscielny.

Still, overall, that early opportunity seemed to have enlivened Arsenal. Oxlade-Chamberlain fed Ramsey to fire just over the bar then Van Persie set up Rosicky to crack an effort goalwards. Evra blocked the drive. Arsenal claimed he had done so with his hand.

Just past the hour, Koscielny stormed forward and Oxlade-Chamberlain scuttled a shot inches wide of the post.

The game was wide open once more. Midway through the half, Welbeck outpaced Mertesacker and clipped the ball past the onrushing Szczesny. However, the German defender slid in to hook the ball off the line.

Then the keeper made a sprawling save to push Welbeck wide and Song booted the ball away from under his own bar.

This game was becoming wonderful entertainment, full of pace and passion. Manchester United were pressing and Arsenal were looking to counter.

They did so successfully in the 71st minute.

Oxlade-Chamberlain stormed forward and clipped a pass inside to Van Persie. The Dutchman’s shot went through the legs of his marker and tickled the fingertips of Anders Lindegaard before finding the far corner.

Van Persie celebrated by showing a t-shirt bearing a 91st birthday message for his grandfather.

Arsenal went on search for an immediate second and only a brave gather by Lindegaard stopped Walcott finding one 13 minutes from the end.

However, nine minute from time, Manchester United stole a second. Valencia burst in from the right, drew in the Arsenal defence and dinked the ball back for Welbeck. The striker sidefooted home.

In the dying stages, Arsenal threw Mertesacker forward. Lindegaard tipped away a dangerous cross from Walcott before the German defender saw his header chested off the line by Jonny Evans.

But in the end they just could not find an equaliser.

Source: Richard Clarke, Arsenal.com on 22 Jan 12

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Gunners out to exact revenge

Manchester United will go into their game at the Emirates against Arsenal on Sunday afternoon knowing that they will have slipped behind Tottenham in second place, or will need to play catch up again to rivals Man City. A draw in the lunchtime kick-off between the two title contenders would afford United the best result, though, as a win over the Gunners would put them within a point of City and give them breathing space from Harry Redknapp's side.

A United win, while not a formality, is certainly expected by many as the club have won seven and lost one of their last nine matches against Arsenal in all competitions. It is a record that makes worse reading for Gunners' fans when you consider that the game will be officiated by Mike Dean, under whom Arsene Wenger's side have won none of their last ten Premier League games (W0 D5 L5).

While Arsenal did beat United 1-0 at the Emirates last season, they have struggled a little since and have only scored more than once in four of their last 16 Premier League games at home and netted just 20 in total over those matches. That said, home is where they have been most stable. With an away record that contains six defeats in ten (including the humiliating 8-2 at Old Trafford) the seven wins with only six goals conceded are a source for optimism in the midst of an injury crisis that has robbed Wenger of most of his defence.

A boost could come in the form of Thomas Vermaelen, who could return at left-back if he can shake off a calf strain, but it looks likely that Johan Djourou and Ignasi Miquel will be pressed into service once more on the flanks with Laurent Koscielny and Per Mertesacker in the middle. Of course, up front, Thierry Henry's loan arrival at the Emirates has given them a boost in the absence of Gervinho and Marouane Chamakh, but United have their own returning hero.

Midfielder Paul Scholes is back at the club to help with their own injury crisis and help them through a period in which they have been uncharacteristically sloppy. A premature exit from the Champions League, Carling Cup defeat to Championship club Crystal Palace and two back-to-back defeats to Blackburn and Newcastle was reason enough to bring the classy midfielder out of retirement and the poor run was quickly tempered by knocking rivals City out of the FA Cup and a 3-0 hammering of Bolton.

The Da Silva twins, Fabio and Rafael, have returned to bolster the defence and, with Rio Ferdinand, Phil Jones and Jonny Evans all fit, Sir Alex Ferguson has a few more options at the back. Furthermore, with the likes of Antonio Valencia, Nani and Wayne Rooney firing on all cylinders in attack, United will be confident that they can inflict a third straight defeat on Arsenal.

Arsenal player to watch: Aaron Ramsey
The Welshman has quickly become central to Arsenal's midfield with a long-term injury to Jack Wilshere, however a poor personal performance in the 3-2 defeat to Swansea showed that he still has work to do. Clever and comfortable on the ball, Ramsey was guilty of giving it away far too easily and cannot afford to make the same mistakes against the Red Devils. He scored in this fixture last season, but has only managed one Premier League goal since.

Manchester United player to watch: Park Ji-Sung
The South Korean is often thrown into United's biggest games and has emerged as a more central figure for the club this season, such is his positional sense and reliability. His work-rate and stamina are the key aspects of his game and among the bare bones of Fergie's squad, his work has been invaluable. Even if the midfielder does not last the entire game, his pressing and eye for a pass mean he will be a handful wherever he pops up.

Key Battle: Ignasi Miquel v Antonio Valencia
In the absence of others, the young Spanish defender has been plugging a gap at left-back, but it is by no means a position that he finds himself comfortable in. Strong and quick, he has the tools at his disposal to cope, but his positional sense and lack of experience at this level have found him wanting. A bad time, then, to be coming up against one of the form players in the Premier League this season. Valencia has proved himself to be a model of versatility as he has filled in at right-back for United, but having been restored to a more familiar wing role, he has blossomed. With a deadly delivery, pace and tricks, Miquel is in for a tough afternoon against the Ecuadorian and Wenger may hope that Vermaelen is able to return to spare his young charge.
 
Source: Jon Carter, ESPN Soccernet on 22 Jan 12